Integrated Assessment of Water Resource Sustainability in the Upper Amojú River Basin, Northern Peruvian Andes
- 1 Facultad de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Mecánica Eléctrica, Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería Ambiental (INAM), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Bagua 01721, Peru
- 2 Facultad de Ingeniería Ambiental, Biosistemas y de la Energía, Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería Ambiental (INAM), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru
- 3 Faculty of Systems Engineering and Electrical Mechanics, National University Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza of Amazonas, Bagua 01721, Peru
- 4 Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Pedro Ruiz Gallo National University, Lambayeque, 14013, Peru
- 5 Professional School of Sociology, Pedro Ruiz Gallo National University, Lambayeque, 14013, Peru
- 6 Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Food Industries, Pedro Ruiz Gallo National University, Lambayeque, 14013, Peru
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive, statistically robust assessment of water resource sustainability in the upper section of the Amojú River Basin, Province of Jaén northern Peruvian Andes, using the Sarandón multi-cirteria methodology. A stratified convenience sample of n = 887 households distributed across 22 localities was surveyed, achieving a margin of error of ±2.61% at the 95% confidence level (finite-population correction applied; N = 2391). Sustainability was assessed across social, environmental, and economic dimensions on a standardised ordinal scale (0–4). Statistical analyses included Shapiro Wilk normality tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests against the sustainability threshold (μ₀ = 2.0), Spearman rank correlations, Kruskal Wallis tests, Cronbach’s α for internal consistency, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to provide empirical support for the indicator weighting structure. The General Sustainability Index (I = 2.32±0.52; median = 2) confirmed that the basin operates at the minimum threshold of sustainability, with 97.4% of respondents classified as sustainable. The Social (SI = 2.52±0.75), Environmental (EI = 2.18±0.39), and Economic (KI = 2.30±0.67) indices all met the threshold criterion (≥2.0). Wilcoxon tests identified three sub-indicators as significantly below the sustainability threshold (all p<0.001): Conservation Zones (mean = 0.59±0.78; 89.4% of respondents scored <2), Solid Waste Management (mean = 1.23±0.89; 68.3% scored <2), and Water Flow Perception (mean = 1.16±0.52; 90.9% scored <2). All three dimension indices were significantly intercorrelated (ρ = 0.271–0.388, p<0.001) and contributed significantly to the general index (ρ = 0.510–0.705, p<0.001). Kruskal Wallis tests confirmed that sub-indicators differed significantly within each dimension (H>971, p<0.001 for all). These findings underscore the urgent need for integrated watershed governance encompassing solid waste management programmes, biodiversity conservation zones, and equitable water tariff policies in Andean headwater basins.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/ojbsci.2026.26.04.080
Copyright: © 2026 Juan Eduardo Suarez-Rivadeneira, Freddy A. Manayay, Mayra Pamela Musayón Diaz, Wilfredo Ruiz Camacho, Edilbrando Vega Calderón, Daniel Olivier Carranza Lizana, Jhosymar Bacalla Tenorio, Juan Alberto Rojas Castillo, Daniel Carranza Montenegro, Eduer Blandimiro Bermilla Rodriguez and Juan Francisco Roble Ruiz. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- 74 Views
- 10 Downloads
- 0 Citations
Download
Keywords
- Water Resource Sustainability
- Sarandón Multi-Criteria Methodology
- Watershed Assessment
- Amojú River Basin
- Peruvian Andes
- Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
- Principal Component Analysis